Comments on: Is the Device the Grammar of Modality? http://edc13.education.ed.ac.uk/phild/2013/01/30/is-the-device-the-grammar-of-modality/ Experiential aesthetics the mechanics of learning behaviour Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:42:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Phil Devine http://edc13.education.ed.ac.uk/phild/2013/01/30/is-the-device-the-grammar-of-modality/#comment-58 Phil Devine Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:19:09 +0000 http://edc13.education.ed.ac.uk/phild/?p=519#comment-58 Modality must need constraints to carry meaning, and to what extent is that constraint shared? Critical design may provide some answers... Modality must need constraints to carry meaning, and to what extent is that constraint shared? Critical design may provide some answers…

]]>
By: cmeckenstock http://edc13.education.ed.ac.uk/phild/2013/01/30/is-the-device-the-grammar-of-modality/#comment-55 cmeckenstock Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:06:22 +0000 http://edc13.education.ed.ac.uk/phild/?p=519#comment-55 That is a very interesting way of looking at meaning making. Certainly there are sets of rule governing each modality perhaps that would act like grammar? That is a very interesting way of looking at meaning making. Certainly there are sets of rule governing each modality perhaps that would act like grammar?

]]>