Cognosphere – Agency of Information?

How agency is acquired is important, can agency only be acquired by representation? I can see links to a Post-Human critique in this argument, a re-evaluation of connections between subject and object (interesting when seen in relation to intersubjectivity). This also asks the question, if ‘a thing’ has Agency, how does Agency re-interpret that ‘things’ existence. Can a ‘thing’, be endowed with Agency, that maybe greater than the agency of humans (?), and can this be interpreted as another manifestation of existence (related to life)?

(http://jofish.com/galleries/2008/mum%20birthday%20trip/index.htm)

Then how is, how an ‘thing’ is represented, as well as it’s attached powers of communication, connectivity and fluidity, important to learning? A re-interpretation of what it means to be existent, related to the apparent possibly? So, is it down to the subject to change it’s view of interpretation of existence, rather than the object being constructed in the image of the subjects concern? That touches on (religion and) God complex…